Dash: an open source, community approach to data publication We have great news! Last week we refreshed our Dash data publication service. For those of…
There’s a New Dash!
Posted in UC3
University of California Curation Center (UC3)
Posted in UC3
Dash: an open source, community approach to data publication We have great news! Last week we refreshed our Dash data publication service. For those of…
The integration of the Merritt repository with Amazon’s S3 and Glacier cloud storage services, previously described in an August 16 post on the Data Pub blog, is…
Thanks to everyone who gave feedback on our previous blog post describing our data management tool for researchers. We received a great deal of input related…
Posted in UC3
A partnership between the CDL, Harvard Library, and UCLA Library has been awarded funding from IMLS to create Cobweb, a collaborative collection development platform for web archiving.…
Posted in UC3
Simba dans le carton, jacme31, CC BY-SA 2.0
This post was originally published on the University of California Office of Scholarly Communication blog.
Last post I wrote about data ownership, and how focusing on “ownership” might drive you nuts without actually answering important questions about what can be done with data. In that context, I mentioned a couple of times that you (or your funder) might want data to be shared under CC0, but I didn’t clarify what CC0 actually means. This week, I’m back to dig into the topic of Creative Commons (CC) licenses and public domain tools — and how they work with data.
UC3 is developing a guide to help researchers assess and progress the maturity of their data management practices. What are we doing? Researchers are increasingly…
Posted in UC3
Tug of war, Kathleen Tyler Conklin, CC BY-NC 2.0
This post was originally published on the University of California Office of Scholarly Communication blog.
Which of these is true?
“The PI owns the data.”
“The university owns the data.”
“Nobody can own it; data isn’t copyrightable.”
You’ve probably heard somebody say at least one of these things — confidently. Maybe you’ve heard all of them. Maybe about the same dataset (but in that case, hopefully not from the same person). So who really owns research data? Well, the short answer is “it depends.”
A longer answer is that determining ownership (and whether there’s even anything to own) can be frustratingly complicated — and, even when obvious, ownership only determines some of what can be done with data. Other things like policies, contracts, and laws may dictate certain terms in circumstances where ownership isn’t relevant — or even augment or overrule an owner where it is. To avoid an unpleasant surprise about what you can or can’t do with your data, you’ll want to plan ahead and think beyond the simple question of ownership.
Posted in UC3
PIDapalooza, a community-led conference on persistent identifiers November 9-10, 2016 Radisson Blu Saga Hotel pidapalooza.org PIDapalooza will bring together creators and users of persistent identifiers…
The UC Curation Center (UC3) has offered innovative digital content access and preservation services to the UC community for over six years through its Merritt repository.…
CDL is recruiting for a new Product Manager. This position will oversee the product management and outreach activities for the Dash project and service, as…